Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to owa-mail-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Microsoft Outlook that enables searching, sending, and managing mail and calendar via the OWA REST API using browser-session authentication, with no Azure AD app registration required.
      170 npm
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Secure MCP server for Microsoft Exchange. It enables authorized users to list, search, read, download attachments, send, and reply to email via EWS with strict access control and audit.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for sending and managing Microsoft Outlook email via the Microsoft Graph API, including drafts, replies, contacts, and directory search.
      170 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for any Microsoft Exchange / OWA deployment. Gives LLM agents access to email, calendar, directory search, folders, availability, and meeting analytics via 30 tools.
      30
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for on-premises Microsoft Exchange, connecting via EWS and NTLM. It provides mail, template, availability, and calendar workflow tools through stdio, with draft-first safety and Windows Credential Manager integration.
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct action and resource, but get_folders and get_calendars have slight overlap since both list folders for mail/calendar. The descriptions clarify the distinction, so ambiguity is low.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in lowercase snake_case. Verbs like get, find, send, create, and update are used predictably, making the API easy to learn and navigate.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 20 tools, the server is heavier than the typical 3-15 range. While the dual email/calendar scope justifies the number, it falls into the 'heavy' category and could feel overwhelming for agents.

    Completeness2/5

    Calendar operations are well-covered with full CRUD and response handling, but the email side has significant gaps: get_folders references move_email, which does not exist, and there is no update or edit operation for emails. This creates dead ends for workflows involving moving or modifying messages.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues