Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to owa-mail-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Microsoft Outlook that enables searching, sending, and managing mail and calendar via the OWA REST API using browser-session authentication, with no Azure AD app registration required.
      81 npm
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Secure MCP server for Microsoft Exchange. It enables authorized users to list, search, read, download attachments, send, and reply to email via EWS with strict access control and audit.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for sending and managing Microsoft Outlook email via the Microsoft Graph API, including drafts, replies, contacts, and directory search.
      81 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for any Microsoft Exchange / OWA deployment. Gives LLM agents access to email, calendar, directory search, folders, availability, and meeting analytics via 30 tools.
      30
      43 PyPI
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for on-premises Microsoft Exchange, connecting via EWS and NTLM. It provides mail, template, availability, and calendar workflow tools through stdio, with draft-first safety and Windows Credential Manager integration.
      11
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct action and resource, but get_folders and get_calendars have slight overlap since both list folders for mail/calendar. The descriptions clarify the distinction, so ambiguity is low.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in lowercase snake_case. Verbs like get, find, send, create, and update are used predictably, making the API easy to learn and navigate.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 20 tools, the server is heavier than the typical 3-15 range. While the dual email/calendar scope justifies the number, it falls into the 'heavy' category and could feel overwhelming for agents.

    Completeness2/5

    Calendar operations are well-covered with full CRUD and response handling, but the email side has significant gaps: get_folders references move_email, which does not exist, and there is no update or edit operation for emails. This creates dead ends for workflows involving moving or modifying messages.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues