No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 29 tools
Tools target well-separated purposes across distinct domains (SEC valuation, E*TRADE brokerage, Congress disclosures, Japanese EDINET, cache/provider infra). There is minor friction where check_disqualifiers overlaps with analyze_ticker (which also runs a disqualifier scan) and etrade_balances vs etrade_positions are close, but the descriptions explicitly draw those lines ("what do I have to deploy?" vs "what do I hold?"). An agent can reliably pick the right tool.
Everything is uniformly snake_case with consistent family prefixes (etrade_*, congress_*, edinet_*, cache_*, setup_*), which makes grouping obvious. The verb style is not uniform—some are verb_noun (get_quotes, analyze_ticker, plan_rebalance) while others are noun_noun (short_interest, fx_rate, bank_call_report)—so it falls short of a single predictable pattern.
29 tools is on the heavy side and sits at the boundary of the 'too many' band, though the breadth of scope (brokerage, SEC analysis, Congress, Japan, caching) justifies most of them. A few could be consolidated (cache_status/cache_clear, the E*TRADE credential tools), but each domain genuinely needs its surface.
Coverage of the deep-value workflow is strong end-to-end: screen_market → check_disqualifiers → analyze_ticker → quotes/macro/fx/corporate-actions → build_allocation → plan_rebalance, plus brokerage read and disclosure data. The main gap is that the E*TRADE integration is read-only—there is no order-placement tool, so a rebalance plan can be produced but not executed through the server.