Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Opyt

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Archives posts from X into a local SQLite database and provides tools for semantic analysis and natural language search. It enables agents to manage low-cost data ingestion and retrieve relevant posts using local embeddings and topic labeling.
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely search, analyze, and draft posts grounded in a local X/Twitter archive, with encrypted storage, scoped tool access, and full audit logging.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes a private social memory archive to AI assistants via MCP, enabling read-only queries about the user's posts, people, and preferences with tools like search, whoami, and timeline.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A local-first knowledge base server that enables AI clients to store, retrieve, and manage documents using semantic search. Provides privacy-focused, offline-capable memory for AI assistants with tools for ingesting, querying, updating, and deleting knowledge.
      7
      191 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to consume, validate, search, and author Open Knowledge Format v0.2 Markdown bundles locally, with optional multi-bundle federation, graph navigation, provenance inspection, and proposal-based updates.
      28
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients like Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor to search, read, and write back to one cross-model Markdown library of saved articles, videos, PDFs, notes, and conversations. Hosted remote server with OAuth 2.1 or Agent-key auth and read_only, edit, or full permission tiers.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions: search routes, open reads raw text, sitting reads a whole topic, share/unshare/accept handle sharing, and onboard/oracle separate setup from trust selection. The main overlap is oracle vs add_oracle, since oracle's confirm action can also add handles, but the descriptions make the direct-add path vs screen/confirm flow distinguishable.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Tool names mix imperative verbs (share, search, open, aggregate, accept, unshare), nouns (oracle, frontier, hopper, sitting), and compound forms (add_oracle, onboard). There is no consistent verb_noun or camelCase pattern, making the naming feel arbitrary even though each name is individually readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is a well-scoped count for a knowledge-base server covering setup, ingestion, retrieval, trust curation, opening/sharing, and accepting shared KBs. Each tool has a distinct job and the set does not feel padded or redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the main lifecycle: onboard for setup, hopper/add_oracle for adding content and people, search/open/aggregate/sitting/frontier for retrieval and analysis, and share/unshare/accept for access control. The only notable gap is the absence of any explicit delete/remove tool for atoms or the knowledge base itself, though this may be intentional.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive