Skip to main content
Glama
mailpace

MailPace MCP Server

Official
by mailpace

Related Servers

Alternatives to MailPace MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables sending single or batch emails via the Postmark API through an MCP server.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server implementation that enables sending emails via Postmark email services with features for sending plain text/HTML emails, using templates, tracking delivery statistics, and listing available templates.
      976 npm
      58
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that sends mail over SMTP, gated behind an allowlist and a human confirmation
      4
      46 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This MCP server provides email sending functionality using Protonmail's SMTP service. It allows both Claude Desktop and Cline VSCode extension to send emails on your behalf using your Protonmail credentials.
      49
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides email sending capabilities via SMTP, featuring tools for sending standard and template-based emails. It utilizes the FastMCP Streamable HTTP transport for flexible client connectivity over HTTP without requiring stdio subprocesses.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that empowers AI agents to securely send emails via SMTP, supporting plain text, HTML, and attachments.
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.7/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools, making disambiguation perfect. The single tool 'send-email' has a clear and distinct purpose without any ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against for patterns. The name 'send-email' follows a verb-noun structure and stands alone without deviation.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool for an email server is too minimal for the apparent scope, as email management typically involves more operations like listing, deleting, or managing templates. This feels thin and incomplete for the domain.

    Completeness1/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for an email server, covering only sending emails with no support for other essential operations like retrieving sent emails, managing contacts, or handling attachments. This will cause significant agent failures in email-related workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues