Skip to main content
Glama
maillog-dev

maillog-mcp

Official
by maillog-dev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to maillog-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • maillog-mcp

      Jorisslagter
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables sending emails and listing sent emails with delivery status and open/click counts via the Maillog API.
      2
      2 npm
      MIT

    • benethos-mailbox-mcp

      benethos-hub
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, sort, draft, and send email from connected mailboxes through MCP tools, with access controlled by per-token permissions.
      2
      MIT

    • Email MCP Server

      gabigabogabu
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables email integration via IMAP and SMTP, allowing model assistants to read, send, search emails, and list folders.
      22 npm
      14
      ISC

    • postlane-mcp

      zwebso
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients and coding agents to send transactional emails, retrieve a message by ID, and list sent emails through the Postlane API using an API key and verified sender domain.
      351 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    send_email and list_emails are clearly distinct: one creates a new email, the other reads previously sent emails. There is no overlap or ambiguity between the two operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern, matching the broader MCP convention. The style is predictable and uniform across the small set.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side for a server, but the pair covers the core send-and-verify workflow implied by the Maillog domain. It is functional yet minimal, so the count is borderline appropriate.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the essential email send and delivery-check lifecycle with no obvious dead ends. Minor gaps exist, such as no single-email detail lookup or domain management, but the core workflow is workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources