Skip to main content
Glama
mahope

passiv-mcp

by mahope
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to passiv-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Web Tools

      rog0x
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to extract structured content from URLs, search the web via DuckDuckGo, monitor site availability, and convert HTML to markdown without requiring API keys.
      5
      30 npm
      MIT

    • mcp-services

      san-npm
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Multi-tool MCP server for AI agents with 29 tools across web scraping, SEO analysis, screenshot and PDF generation, domain intelligence, content extraction, multi-chain EVM blockchain queries, and security toolkit. Free tier available with no auth required.
      12 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Website Intelligence MCP

      samayhuf-star
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Website Intelligence MCP Server exposes 10 tools for web scraping and analysis, enabling AI agents to convert URLs to Markdown, extract metadata, detect technologies, find contacts, and perform SEO checks. It wraps a REST API and supports optional API keys.
      MIT

    • Crawlberg MCP Server

      xberg-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to crawl and scrape websites, converting HTML to clean Markdown and structured metadata with support for JavaScript rendering, bot evasion, and SSRF protection.
      178
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The four tools have distinct primary purposes: security headers, HTML conversion, compliance scanning, and page profiling. However, there is some overlap: both compliance_scan and profile_page include security headers in their checks, and check_security_headers is a standalone tool for the same. This minor redundancy could cause confusion about which tool to use for security header information.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun or noun_noun pattern (check_security_headers, html_to_markdown, compliance_scan, profile_page). They are clear, descriptive, and use snake_case uniformly with no mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a reasonable number for a focused web analysis and conversion server. It covers distinct functionalities without bloat. Slightly on the lower side but adequate for the apparent scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers several web page analysis and conversion tasks, but notable gaps exist: no tool for analyzing performance metrics, broken links, or SEO beyond compliance and profiling. More importantly, check_security_headers is subsumed by compliance_scan and profile_page, suggesting incomplete decomposition or redundant surface. However, for the listed core functionalities, the surface is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources