passiv-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to passiv-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to extract structured content from URLs, search the web via DuckDuckGo, monitor site availability, and convert HTML to markdown without requiring API keys.536 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to run privacy-first network diagnostics (egress IP, proxies, DNS, port checks, security-header audits), handle authentication primitives like TOTP and disposable inboxes, and use developer utilities such as URL-to-markdown reading, webhook inspection, hashing, file/paste sharing, and read-only EVM RPC calls. All tools are free, require no API keys, and operate under a zero-log policy with automatic expiry.16338 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to validate AI infrastructure claims, check endpoint availability, solve CAPTCHA challenges, convert web pages to Markdown, search the web, extract structured JSON, and fetch bot-protected HTML through native tool calls.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMulti-tool MCP server for AI agents with 29 tools across web scraping, SEO analysis, screenshot and PDF generation, domain intelligence, content extraction, multi-chain EVM blockchain queries, and security toolkit. Free tier available with no auth required.33 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceWebsite Intelligence MCP Server exposes 10 tools for web scraping and analysis, enabling AI agents to convert URLs to Markdown, extract metadata, detect technologies, find contacts, and perform SEO checks. It wraps a REST API and supports optional API keys.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI editors and agents to read public web pages as clean Markdown and convert URLs, HTML, or Markdown into PDF, Word, Markdown, HTML, or JSON documents.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
The four tools have distinct primary purposes: security headers, HTML conversion, compliance scanning, and page profiling. However, there is some overlap: both compliance_scan and profile_page include security headers in their checks, and check_security_headers is a standalone tool for the same. This minor redundancy could cause confusion about which tool to use for security header information.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun or noun_noun pattern (check_security_headers, html_to_markdown, compliance_scan, profile_page). They are clear, descriptive, and use snake_case uniformly with no mixing of conventions.
Four tools is a reasonable number for a focused web analysis and conversion server. It covers distinct functionalities without bloat. Slightly on the lower side but adequate for the apparent scope.
The server covers several web page analysis and conversion tasks, but notable gaps exist: no tool for analyzing performance metrics, broken links, or SEO beyond compliance and profiling. More importantly, check_security_headers is subsumed by compliance_scan and profile_page, suggesting incomplete decomposition or redundant surface. However, for the listed core functionalities, the surface is complete.