get_tooling_setup

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. By saying 'Returns install guides', it makes clear this is an informational retrieval operation with no side effects, which is important for safety. It does not overpromise installation or execution, so the agent understands it is safe.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence followed by a compact parameter specification. Every word adds value, and it is front-loaded with the primary action. No unnecessary fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (one param, no output schema), the description is adequately complete. It explains what is returned (install guides) and what the parameter does. A slight gap exists in not clarifying the output format or the effect of omitting the parameter, but these are minor for such a simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one enum parameter with zero description coverage, but the description compensates by listing the allowed values ('tool: graphify|rtk|caveman|superpowers|all'). However, it does not specify the default behavior when the optional parameter is omitted, which would have made the semantics clearer.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool 'Returns install guides' for four specific tools, which distinguishes it from sibling tools that retrieve other types of context. The verb 'returns' plus the resource list makes the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies its usage: when you need install guides for the listed tools. It does not explicitly mention alternatives or when not to use it, but the niche purpose is clear enough that an agent can infer appropriate use. No exclusions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.