Skip to main content
Glama
mahdyarief

journal-scout-mcp

by mahdyarief

Related Servers

Alternatives to journal-scout-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching Elsevier's Scopus database for scientific literature, retrieving abstracts and metadata, and exporting results in RIS or BibTeX format.
      20 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to search and analyze academic papers from multiple sources, fetch metadata and full text, and build structured outputs like literature maps and paper comparisons.
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables searching, downloading, and exporting academic papers from 20+ scholarly sources including arXiv, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar. Supports multi-source concurrent search, citation network tracing, and export to CSV, RIS, and BibTeX.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Scopus to AI assistants for literature discovery. Provides tools for finding papers, experts, citation networks, and analyzing research trends.
      2
      GPL 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching and downloading academic papers from 14 platforms including arXiv, PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Springer, and Sci-Hub with unified data format and intelligent rate limiting.
      21
      1,634 npm
      185
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Some tools have overlapping purposes: get_author_profile and scival_author_lookup both retrieve author information but from different systems, and get_paper vs get_abstract_details both resolve paper metadata. The individual search_* tools are clearly distinct by source, but the SciVal metrics vs lookup tools may confuse an agent. Overall, boundaries are mostly clear but not every tool has a sharply distinct role.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The search_* and get_* tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern, but the scival_* tools break this by using a noun_prefix with no verb (e.g., scival_author_metrics vs. get_scival_author_metrics). Within the scival group naming is consistent, but mixing two conventions across the server reduces predictability. The pattern is readable but not uniform.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 17 tools, the count is slightly above the typical 3-15 sweet spot but still well-scoped for a multi-source scholarly search and metrics server. The number feels justified given the many supported APIs (Scopus, arXiv, OpenAlex, etc.) and SciVal's separate lookups/metrics. It is not excessive and each tool appears to serve a plausible need.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core academic search workflow: combined and source-specific searches, paper resolution, citation graph, author profiles, and SciVal metrics. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct full-text retrieval (only open-access links) and no journal-level search or repository export functionality, but these are not critical for the apparent purpose. Agents can accomplish typical research tasks without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues