Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
TYPESAFE_API_KEYNoOptional API key to enable Jev semantic sensor integration. If not set, Jev functionality is disabled and only deterministic tools are available.

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
enzo_atomizeC

Validate one proposed claim and admit, decompose, or request refinement.

enzo_observeB

Evaluate typed evidence for one admitted atomic claim.

Deterministic evidence is authoritative. With TYPESAFE_API_KEY configured, semantic-only questions are evaluated by Pydantic AI's TypeSafe/Jev provider.

enzo_stateB

Return canonical history and computed investigation status.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool maps to a distinct stage in the investigation workflow: atomize handles claim validation/admission, observe evaluates evidence against an admitted claim, and state returns the accumulated history and status. There is no meaningful overlap between tool purposes.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools share the consistent enzo_ prefix followed by a single lowercase word, creating a predictable enzo_<action> pattern. Even though 'state' is noun-like, the naming convention is uniform across the set.

Tool Count5/5

Three tools is well-scoped for this narrow investigation workflow, and each tool is load-bearing: one for claims, one for evidence evaluation, and one for state. No tool feels redundant or missing for the stated purpose.

Completeness5/5

The server covers the full claim-investigation loop: claim validation/decomposition, evidence evaluation, and canonical history/status retrieval. An agent can iterate between atomize and observe and consult state at any point without hitting a dead end.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues