list_blocks
List all shadcn/ui blocks to find and select components for your project.
Instructions
List all available shadcn/ui blocks
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all shadcn/ui blocks to find and select components for your project.
List all available shadcn/ui blocks
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Minimal but adequate: 'list' implies a read-only, safe operation. Lacks details on pagination or return format, but for a no-parameter tool this is acceptable.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff. Front-loaded verb and resource. Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters or output schema, the description sufficiently explains the tool's purpose. Lacks mention of return type but siblings imply block objects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist; baseline score per rule (0 params = baseline 4). No need to add parameter info.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description uses specific verb 'List' and resource 'all available shadcn/ui blocks', clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like get_block (single block) and list_components (components).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives, but the simple description implies usage for retrieving all blocks. Missing when-not or alternative recommendations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/magnusrodseth/shadcn-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server