A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceMCP server for controlling PNETLab v6 network labs via natural language, enabling topology creation, node management, config push, console interaction, and link fault injection.
24
1
Apache 2.0
mcp-eveng
by madmickstar
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-eveng
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives Claude and other LLM agents programmatic access to EVE-NG network labs, enabling creation, configuration, and management of virtual network topologies through natural language.142Apache 2.0
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to manage network topologies, labs, nodes, and configurations in the EVE-NG network emulation platform through a standardized interface.2614-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for managing home lab VMs and PNETLab topologies, enabling AI agents to power VMs, handle snapshots, and verify device configurations with explicit allowlists and confirmation gating.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Cisco Modeling Labs (CML) that enables building, managing, and running network labs through MCP tools, wrapping the CML Python SDK for lab/topology CRUD, node/link management, and configuration.22-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with NetBox API, enabling users to query and manage NetBox resources such as devices through natural language.-
TDQS
A3.7/5.0
Scored across 36 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with operations well-organized around labs, nodes, networks, and folders. A few tools like `edit_lab_node` and `edit_lab_nodes_by_template` have overlapping scope but are differentiated by bulk vs. single-node editing.
Naming Consistency4/5
Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., `add_lab_node`, `delete_lab_network`, `start_node`). Minor inconsistencies exist like `change_node_delay` vs. `edit_lab_node`, but overall the pattern is predictable and readable.
Tool Count4/5
With 36 tools, the surface is large but well-justified by the complexity of EVE-NG lab management (folders, labs, nodes, networks, wiring, lifecycle). Each tool covers a distinct operation, and the count feels appropriate for the domain.
Completeness5/5
The tool set covers the full lifecycle for EVE-NG: CRUD for folders, labs, nodes, and networks; node wiring; power operations; export; and status. No obvious gaps for common lab management tasks, including advanced features like bulk editing and sharing.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues