GTD MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to GTD MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA local Model Context Protocol server providing backend tools for AI agents to manage projects and tasks with persistent storage in SQLite, enabling structured tracking of project tasks with dependencies, priorities, and statuses.123 npm25GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA robust Model Context Protocol server for managing todos with capabilities for task creation, filtering, and statistical analysis. It enables AI assistants to interact with todo datasets through specialized tools, structured resources, and intelligent productivity prompts.4 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language task management including logging, updating, and summarizing productivity activities across multiple categories using a local SQLite database. It allows users to manage workflows and generate time-based summaries through standardized Model Context Protocol tools.1-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with TickTick/Dida365 task management API, supporting operations like creating, reading, updating, and deleting tasks and projects.119 npm35MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing AI assistants with comprehensive project, task, and subtask management capabilities with project-specific storage.2910 npm88MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceThis is a demo MCP server exposing SQLite-backed task management (CRUD), a calculator, and server metadata tools via the Model Context Protocol, and can be interacted with through natural language via any MCP-compatible client.-
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Each tool has a distinct and clearly defined purpose, with no overlapping functionality. For example, capture_task is for raw inbox items while create_task is for structured actionable tasks, and specialized tools like get_next_actions, get_inbox, and get_stats serve unique aggregation roles.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using lowercase snake_case (e.g., capture_task, get_next_actions, delete_project). This predictability aids agent comprehension and selection.
With 17 tools, the set is well-scoped for a GTD methodology server. Each tool addresses a specific operation in the GTD workflow without redundancy or bloat, balancing coverage with conciseness.
The tool surface covers core GTD operations: capture, creation, update, deletion, status tracking, and listing for both tasks and projects. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of batch operations or explicit 'review' tools, but core workflows are fully supported.