Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to GTD MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local Model Context Protocol server providing backend tools for AI agents to manage projects and tasks with persistent storage in SQLite, enabling structured tracking of project tasks with dependencies, priorities, and statuses.
      12
      3 npm
      25
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A robust Model Context Protocol server for managing todos with capabilities for task creation, filtering, and statistical analysis. It enables AI assistants to interact with todo datasets through specialized tools, structured resources, and intelligent productivity prompts.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language task management including logging, updating, and summarizing productivity activities across multiple categories using a local SQLite database. It allows users to manage workflows and generate time-based summaries through standardized Model Context Protocol tools.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with TickTick/Dida365 task management API, supporting operations like creating, reading, updating, and deleting tasks and projects.
      11
      9 npm
      35
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This is a demo MCP server exposing SQLite-backed task management (CRUD), a calculator, and server metadata tools via the Model Context Protocol, and can be interacted with through natural language via any MCP-compatible client.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct and clearly defined purpose, with no overlapping functionality. For example, capture_task is for raw inbox items while create_task is for structured actionable tasks, and specialized tools like get_next_actions, get_inbox, and get_stats serve unique aggregation roles.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using lowercase snake_case (e.g., capture_task, get_next_actions, delete_project). This predictability aids agent comprehension and selection.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 17 tools, the set is well-scoped for a GTD methodology server. Each tool addresses a specific operation in the GTD workflow without redundancy or bloat, balancing coverage with conciseness.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core GTD operations: capture, creation, update, deletion, status tracking, and listing for both tasks and projects. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of batch operations or explicit 'review' tools, but core workflows are fully supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues