searxng-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to searxng-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes via URIs and tools.1210 npm8MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceThis TypeScript-based MCP server allows users to manage and interact with a note system through Model Context Protocol, enabling note creation and summarization with URIs and metadata.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis TypeScript-based MCP server enables users to manage and summarize text notes, providing tools for note creation and summarization prompts.2,509 npm10MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that enables users to manage text notes with features like note creation and summary generation using a Model Context Protocol.1-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, providing resources for accessing notes via URIs, tools for creating notes, and prompts for generating summaries.75 npm-
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server implementing a simple notes system that allows users to create, access, and generate summaries of text notes.14 npm-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: get_available_engines retrieves metadata about search engines, while search performs actual searches. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (get_available_engines and search). The naming is straightforward and predictable across the toolset.
With only two tools, the server feels under-scoped for a search functionality domain. While the core search operation is present, typical search-related operations like managing preferences, saving searches, or advanced filtering are missing, making the toolset feel thin.
The toolset is severely incomplete for a search server. It lacks essential operations such as configuring search settings, handling search history, or integrating with other data sources. The surface is minimal and does not cover the expected lifecycle of search interactions.