Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to outlook-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for personal Outlook.com/Hotmail/Live accounts, enabling email triage, folder management, bulk operations, and newsletter unsubscribe via Microsoft Graph.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Microsoft Outlook via Graph API. 20 consolidated tools for email, calendar, contacts, folders, rules, categories, and settings with safety controls (dry-run preview, rate limiting, recipient allowlists) and MCP annotations on every tool.
      8
      22
      316 npm
      37
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server for personal Microsoft Outlook/Hotmail accounts, enabling email search, reading, attachment management, and folder operations via Microsoft Graph API with OAuth device-code flow.
      6
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing full control over Outlook.com, Hotmail, Live, or Microsoft 365 email via Microsoft Graph API, enabling reading, searching, sending, and managing messages and folders securely.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first Microsoft Outlook MCP server: a single Go binary that manages calendar events and mail through the Microsoft Graph API over stdio, with tokens stored in the OS keychain and no Entra ID app registration required. Exposes four aggregate tools (calendar, mail, account, system) dispatched by an operation verb, with multi-account support and read-only and mail-gating modes.
      4
      42
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that connects Claude Desktop to a personal Hotmail/Outlook.com mailbox via Microsoft Graph API, enabling email management, rule handling, and composing messages.
      25
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    All 19 tools have clearly distinct purposes. Overlapping operations like moving vs. marking vs. archiving are separated into manual-ID-based and search-based variants with explicit use cases. Folder management and rule tools are orthogonal to message operations. No two tools could be easily confused.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses a consistent `verb_noun` pattern in lower snake_case (e.g., `list_folders`, `move_messages`, `create_rule`). No camelCase or mixed conventions appear. The naming uniformly reflects the action and target resource.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 19 tools, the surface is comprehensive but slightly above the typical 3–15 sweet spot. However, each tool addresses a distinct need (message search, CRUD, bulk operations, folder management, rules, diagnostics) and none feel redundant. The count is appropriate for a full-featured email management server.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle of email messages (search, read, move, mark, archive, trash, create draft/reply) and folders (create, rename, move, delete) plus automated rules. Missing features like permanent deletion or attachment handling are deliberate omissions (data safety, scope). A minor gap is the lack of a 'forward draft' tool, but this does not critically hinder typical workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues