Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to JFrog MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for searching and listing components in Nexus Repository Manager 3 (Docker, Maven, npm, PyPI, etc.) with tools for repositories, components, Docker tags, and latest version.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that enables AI assistants to search files, list directories, retrieve system info, and get file metadata on the local file system.
      4
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for AI clients to browse and search project files securely, with configurable permissions, virtual paths, and key-based access.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Secure multi-source MCP server for reading local, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and network source code with read-only-by-default access, enabling AI assistants to inspect repositories safely.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: health check, capabilities, repository listing, path listing, item metadata, properties, stats, tree traversal, file search, and latest files. The only potential ambiguity is between get_item_info and get_item_properties, but the descriptions clarify that info is general metadata while properties are specific key-value pairs.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent get_/list_/find_ verb-noun pattern (e.g., get_item_properties, list_repositories, find_files). Minor deviations exist: jfrog_ping and jfrog_capabilities are verb/noun alone, and jfrog_latest_files uses an adjective instead of a verb, but the overall style is coherent and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is well within the ideal range for a focused MCP server. Each tool addresses a specific task within the artifact repository domain, and the count feels neither sparse nor overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the read-only/query surface thoroughly: repository listing, path browsing, metadata, properties, statistics, tree traversal, file search, and recent files. It lacks write operations (create/update/delete), but the tools are clearly scoped to inspection and discovery, so the absence does not create dead ends for its apparent purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues