Skip to main content
Glama
m-tahoon1612

mcp-sql-lite

by m-tahoon1612

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-sql-lite

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only exploration and analysis of an included SQLite shop database through tools for listing tables, describing schemas, and running SQL queries.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to inspect and analyze a local SQLite shop database through read-only, single-query SELECT operations, with schema inspection and paginated querying.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to explore and query SQLite databases through read-only, sandboxed tools for listing tables, describing schemas, fetching DDL, and running a single capped SELECT statement. Also supports plain-English questions that are converted to SQL and routed through the same sandbox.
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents read-only analytical access to a SQLite database over stdio, with tools for listing tables, describing schemas, and running paginated SQL queries.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language querying and safe read/write access to a small e-commerce SQLite database through MCP tools, including schema inspection, SELECT queries, and explicitly confirmed mutations.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage of the workflow: listing tables, inspecting one table's schema, and executing a query. There is no overlap between discovery, inspection, and execution, so misselection is unlikely.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_tables, describe_table, run_select). The vocabulary is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is on the lean side, but each maps to a necessary step in a read-only SQL workflow and none is redundant. It is well-scoped for a 'lite' server, though a slightly richer surface would not feel bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The list → describe → select lifecycle covers the core read-only use case, and the LIMIT safeguard prevents runaway results. Minor gaps exist (no EXPLAIN/query-plan inspection, no database/schema enumeration for multi-schema databases), but agents can work around these with SELECT queries.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues