Yuque MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Yuque MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol service that enables AI agents to securely access and operate Yuque knowledge bases via the Yuque OpenAPI.14Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Yuque (语雀) platform through MCP protocol, supporting knowledge base management, document operations, search, and team collaboration features.10MIT

Yuque MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Yuque (语雀) that exposes your knowledge base to AI assistants through the Model Context Protocol.19444234MIT- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with Yuque (语雀) knowledge base platform through their API. Supports document management, search, and repository operations including creating, reading, updating, and deleting documents in multiple formats.9463MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables access to Yuque (语雀) documentation through cookie-based authentication, supporting document retrieval, search, TOC navigation, and content management from knowledge bases via URL or namespace.44444MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI clients to read and write Yuque documents through MCP, providing tools for managing user info, knowledge bases, and documents with dual authentication modes (official API or cookie).-
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Most tools are distinct (get vs list vs create vs delete), but the four group stats tools (group_stats, group_member_stats, group_book_stats, group_doc_stats) have overlapping names and could be confused for one another. All other tools have clearly separated purposes.
The dominant pattern is yuque_verb_noun (e.g., get_repo, create_doc, list_docs). The four group stats tools break this by using group_..._stats without a verb, and yuque_hello is an outlier. Overall, naming is mostly consistent with minor deviations.
With 25 tools, this is at the upper boundary of a heavy toolset. The domain covers repos, docs, groups, members, versions, TOC, stats, and search, but several stats tools could be consolidated. It is not bloated, but it is slightly over the typical well-scoped range.
Repos and docs have full CRUD coverage, plus TOC, versions, and search. However, there is no group creation/deletion, no way to add a member (only remove/update), and no features like comments or attachments. These are notable gaps for a collaborative knowledge base platform.