Skip to main content
Glama
lzientek

notlai-mcp

by lzientek

notlai_update_note

Update an existing note by changing only specified fields: title, content, tags, folder, or favorite status. Supports Markdown formatting.

Instructions

Update an existing note. Only provided fields will be changed. Content supports Markdown formatting. Use notlai_list_notes to find the note ID.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tagsNoNew tags to assign (replaces all current tags). Pass [] to remove all tags. Omit to keep current tags.
titleNoNew title (omit to keep current)
noteIdYesThe note ID to update (ULID format)
contentNoNew content in Markdown format (omit to keep current). Supports headings, bold, italic, lists, code blocks, links, blockquotes, and tables.
folderIdNoMove to a folder by ID, or pass null to move back to root. Omit to keep current folder.
isFavoriteNoSet favorite status. Omit to keep current.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description carries burden. It explains partial update ('Only provided fields will be changed'), Markdown support, and tag replacement. Missing details on authorization, error handling, or what happens on invalid noteId.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences: purpose, partial update behavior, usage hint. No extraneous information. Well-structured and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so description should mention return value (e.g., success indicator or updated note). Does not cover that. Also lacks differentiation from move_note for folder changes. Adequate but could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage 100%, baseline 3. Description adds some value for tags ('Pass [] to remove all tags') but largely restates schema. No additional constraint details beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb 'Update' and resource 'existing note'. Distinguishes from siblings like create_note and delete_note. Adds detail on partial update behavior.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Suggests using notlai_list_notes to find note ID, but does not clarify when to use this tool versus notlai_move_note for folder changes. No explicit exclusions or alternative tools guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lzientek/notlai-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server