ptv_probeServerServices

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description discloses key trait (read-only, no service changes). But lacks details on permissions, error handling, or response behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single concise sentence, no redundancy. Could better structure to separate purpose from scope, but efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, description is minimally adequate for a read-only probe but lacks parameter details and usage context among 22 sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and description adds no explanation for deviceName, maxDepth, or maxKeys beyond their names. Meaningful parameter semantics absent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Explicitly states verb (probe/scan) and resource (Server-PT devices for DNS/HTTP/FTP/DHCP related API names). Distinguishes from sibling ptv_probeDeviceApi by specifying focus on service automation hints and read-only nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like ptv_probeDeviceApi. Only implies read-only probing without exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.