miniapp_showcase_roadmap

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. The description indicates the tool outputs a roadmap but does not disclose whether it modifies data, requires authentication, or has side effects. The verb '输出' suggests a read-only operation, but this is not explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that covers the tool's purpose and key output components. No unnecessary words; front-loaded with action and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lists output components but does not explain the output format (e.g., text, JSON, checklist) or error handling. Given no output schema, more detail on what the agent can expect would be helpful. Sibling tools are planning-related, so context is moderate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All parameters have descriptions in the schema, so baseline is 3. The tool description does not add meaning beyond the schema; it lists roadmap components but does not explain how parameters like 'depth' or 'phase' affect the output. Parameter semantics are adequately covered by the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool outputs an executable roadmap for mini-program showcase, listing specific components like business positioning, MVP boundary, etc. It uses a specific verb '输出' and resource '路线图', but does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like miniapp_generate_blueprint or miniapp_launch_checklist.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for beginners ('小白可执行') but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No exclusions or conditions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.