Skip to main content
Glama
ly8427

review-board

by ly8427
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to review-board

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • TaskFlow MCP

      SyedFrazAli
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to manage a SQLite-backed task board directly through MCP, with tools to add, list, update status, and delete tasks and a markdown board resource.
      MIT

    • AI Bridge

      cynicism66
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI agents and humans working in the same project to share status, exchange messages, and claim files through a local collaboration board. It supports project-specific enablement, conflict-aware file claims, and shared state via SQLite.
      7
      MIT

    • vibecheck

      mgd34msu
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to track and coordinate project work through a shared SQLite ledger, including task plans, session ancestry, claims, work locations, blockers, and commits via MCP tools.
      9
      -

    • acta

      nubisco
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and humans to collaboratively manage kanban boards and Markdown documentation via MCP tools, with stable item keys, revision-safe editing, and full audit trails.
      MIT
    • AgentTasker by BadbotAI

      AgentTaskerofficial

      BadbotAI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create, query, update, claim, hand off, and complete tasks on a local SQLite-backed, project-namespaced kanban board through stdio MCP tools, including filtering for ready/blocked/stale work and exchanging task attachments. It also lets agents list projects and manage statuses, ownership, and evidence without any server or accounts.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool occupies a distinct role: token lifecycle, thread/comment operations, governance actions, and observation are cleanly separated. Close pairs like post_comment/reply_comment and set_status/set_verdict are clearly disambiguated by target and semantics.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools follow verb_noun snake_case with consistent verbs like get_, list_, set_, create_, post_, and reply_. Only reliability_profile breaks the pattern as a bare noun, and list_comments_since is slightly awkward, but the overall convention is predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 16 tools this is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but the server covers a broad governance workflow spanning tokens, threads, comments, quorum, and reliability. Each tool maps to a distinct operation, so the count is justified despite feeling a bit heavy.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is well covered: protocol/token onboarding, thread creation and commenting, status changes, quorum verdicts, revision bumps, and polling. Minor gaps such as no comment/thread edit or delete and no participant management are either likely intentional or workable around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources