Skip to main content
Glama
ly8427

review-board

by ly8427
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to review-board

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • TaskFlow MCP

      SyedFrazAli
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to manage a SQLite-backed task board directly through MCP, with tools to add, list, update status, and delete tasks and a markdown board resource.
      MIT

    • AI Bridge

      cynicism66
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI agents and humans working in the same project to share status, exchange messages, and claim files through a local collaboration board. It supports project-specific enablement, conflict-aware file claims, and shared state via SQLite.
      7
      MIT

    • vibecheck

      mgd34msu
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to track and coordinate project work through a shared SQLite ledger, including task plans, session ancestry, claims, work locations, blockers, and commits via MCP tools.
      9
      -

    • acta

      nubisco
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and humans to collaboratively manage kanban boards and Markdown documentation via MCP tools, with stable item keys, revision-safe editing, and full audit trails.
      MIT
    • AgentTasker by BadbotAI

      AgentTaskerofficial

      BadbotAI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create, query, update, claim, hand off, and complete tasks on a local SQLite-backed, project-namespaced kanban board through stdio MCP tools, including filtering for ready/blocked/stale work and exchanging task attachments. It also lets agents list projects and manage statuses, ownership, and evidence without any server or accounts.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool occupies a distinct role: token lifecycle, thread/comment operations, governance actions, and observation are cleanly separated. Close pairs like post_comment/reply_comment and set_status/set_verdict are clearly disambiguated by target and semantics.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools follow verb_noun snake_case with consistent verbs like get_, list_, set_, create_, post_, and reply_. Only reliability_profile breaks the pattern as a bare noun, and list_comments_since is slightly awkward, but the overall convention is predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 16 tools this is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but the server covers a broad governance workflow spanning tokens, threads, comments, quorum, and reliability. Each tool maps to a distinct operation, so the count is justified despite feeling a bit heavy.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is well covered: protocol/token onboarding, thread creation and commenting, status changes, quorum verdicts, revision bumps, and polling. Minor gaps such as no comment/thread edit or delete and no participant management are either likely intentional or workable around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources