MCP Server Boilerplate
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Server Boilerplate
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA starter template for building Model Context Protocol servers that integrate with AI assistants like Claude and Cursor, providing custom tools, resource providers, and prompt templates.212 npm-
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA starter template for building Model Context Protocol servers that integrate with AI assistants like Claude and Cursor, providing custom tools, resource providers, and prompt templates.212 npm-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA starter template for building Model Context Protocol servers that can integrate AI assistants with custom tools, resource providers, and prompt templates.184 npm1-
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA starter template for building Model Context Protocol servers that can be integrated with Cursor or Claude Desktop, allowing developers to create custom tools and extensions for AI assistants.119 npm14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA template for building Model Context Protocol servers that allow AI assistants to interact with custom data and services through queryable resources and specialized tools.6MIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA starter template for building MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that can integrate with Claude, Cursor, or other MCP-compatible AI assistants. Provides a foundation with example implementations of tools, resources, and prompts along with installation scripts.212 npm-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: one is for creating MCP servers (get-mcp-docs) and the other is for greeting users (hello-world). There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool.
The naming is inconsistent: get-mcp-docs uses a verb-object format with hyphens, while hello-world is a phrase without a clear verb. This mixed convention lacks a predictable pattern, which could confuse agents trying to infer tool functions from names.
With only 2 tools, this server feels under-scoped for a 'boilerplate' purpose, which typically implies a foundational set of utilities. Such a low count limits functionality and suggests the server might not cover basic operations expected in a boilerplate context.
For a boilerplate server, there are significant gaps: it lacks core operations like setup, configuration, testing, or deployment tools. The two tools provided (documentation and greeting) do not form a complete surface for building or managing MCP servers, leaving agents unable to perform essential tasks.