gallery_set_current_powergrade_album

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must convey behavioral traits. It states the operation (switch active album) and the target, but doesn't disclose side effects, error handling if the album doesn't exist, or whether it's a safe reversible operation. It adds basic transparency beyond the schema but misses important context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It clearly states the action and the parameter in a compact form.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple one-parameter setter nature and an existing output schema, the description is adequate. It doesn't explain prerequisites like an open project, but the simplicity and schema coverage reduce the need. A small gap remains around error behavior, but overall it's complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description covers the parameter fully ('Exact name of the target PowerGrade album'), and the description only restates the parameter's role without adding extra meaning. Baseline 3 applies due to 100% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Switch' with a clear resource 'active PowerGrade album' and the target is defined by the parameter. It clearly differentiates from sibling gallery_set_current_album by specifying PowerGrade, matching the tool name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for PowerGrade albums, but it doesn't explicitly mention alternatives or when to use this over gallery_set_current_album. The guidance is largely inferred from the tool name and parameter rather than stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.