list_canvases
List all canvases with their ID, name, size, and path count.
Instructions
List all canvases with id, name, size, path count.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all canvases with their ID, name, size, and path count.
List all canvases with id, name, size, path count.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose read-only nature, side effects, auth needs, or rate limits. The tool likely has no side effects, but this is not stated.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 8 words, front-loaded with action and fields. Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple 0-parameter tool and no output schema, the description lists the returned fields (id, name, size, path count), which is adequate. Could mention pagination or ordering, but not critical.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so baseline is 4. The description does not need to add parameter info.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states 'List all canvases', a clear verb+resource. Sibling tools create/delete canvases or paths, so this tool is well-distinguished.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use: to list canvases. No explicit when-not or alternatives are mentioned, but for a simple list tool the context is clear.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lulu0119/svg-whiteboard-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server