get_memory_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool returns a structured summary, highlights, statistics, and a human-readable summary. It implies a read-only operation (no mention of modification). Could add explicit side-effect info, but overall adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences: states purpose, details output components, and adds a benefit statement. No wasted words, well-structured, and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (0 params, no output schema), the description fully explains what it does and what the output contains. It covers the full scope of the tool's function.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are 0 parameters, and schema coverage is 100% (empty schema). The description does not need to add parameter info. Baseline for 0 params is 4, which is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Get a structured summary of what the AI remembers about the user.' It specifies the resource (memory profile) and verb (get), and distinguishes it from siblings by detailing the output type (highlights, statistics, summary) which is different from raw memory queries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions it 'Lets users see and audit what AI remembers,' implying an overview/audit use case. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or provide alternatives among the many sibling tools (e.g., recall_memories for specific memories).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.