mcp-sonarcloud
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-sonarcloud
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables seamless integration with SonarQube Server or Cloud for code quality and security analysis. Supports querying project metrics, issues, and analyzing code snippets directly within the agent context.655-- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables Cursor AI to query SonarQube for pull request metrics, issues, file issues, and duplication reports directly, without manual data export.458 npmMIT

Codacy MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables access to Codacy's code quality platform through natural language, providing repository management, security analysis, pull request reviews, and local CLI-based code analysis. Supports comprehensive code quality monitoring including issues, coverage, security vulnerabilities, and technical debt assessment across organizations and repositories.1,455 npm62MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and managing Sentry projects, issues, and events through natural language.13 npmISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables triggering GuardBee security scans via natural language, checking scan status, filtering findings by severity or ID, and obtaining AI-assisted remediation guidance.337 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables access to SonarQube code quality analysis through MCP, including issue searching, metrics retrieval, and quality gate status.-
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: issues (search, changelog, authors, tags), hotspots (search, show, change status), quality gates (list, show, search, get by project, get status), and components (show, tree). Even the multiple quality-gate tools are clearly separated by purpose (listing all, showing one, associating projects, fetching by project, checking status). No two tools appear to do the same thing.
Tool names predominantly follow a verb_noun pattern: get_, list_, search_, show_, change_. The main deviation is 'component_tree' (noun_noun) instead of something like 'get_component_tree'. Also 'search_my_sonarqube_projects' uses an awkward 'my' qualifier. Overall, the naming is predictable and readable, with only minor inconsistencies.
15 tools is at the upper end of the ideal 3-15 range but well-scoped for a SonarCloud server covering projects, issues, hotspots, and quality gates. Each tool serves a distinct need, and none feel redundant or superfluous. The count is appropriate for the breadth of the domain.
The toolset provides good read coverage for projects, components, issues, hotspots, and quality gates, plus write capability for hotspot status changes. Minor gaps include the absence of an update-issue tool (e.g., to resolve or reassign issues) and no create/modify/delete operations for quality gates or projects. These are workable gaps since the server seems focused on analysis and reporting, but agents may need to work around the missing issue-update capability.