Skip to main content
Glama
lukleh
by lukleh

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-sonarcloud

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables access to Codacy's code quality platform through natural language, providing repository management, security analysis, pull request reviews, and local CLI-based code analysis. Supports comprehensive code quality monitoring including issues, coverage, security vulnerabilities, and technical debt assessment across organizations and repositories.
      1,455 npm
      62
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying and managing Sentry projects, issues, and events through natural language.
      13 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables triggering GuardBee security scans via natural language, checking scan status, filtering findings by severity or ID, and obtaining AI-assisted remediation guidance.
      337 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: issues (search, changelog, authors, tags), hotspots (search, show, change status), quality gates (list, show, search, get by project, get status), and components (show, tree). Even the multiple quality-gate tools are clearly separated by purpose (listing all, showing one, associating projects, fetching by project, checking status). No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names predominantly follow a verb_noun pattern: get_, list_, search_, show_, change_. The main deviation is 'component_tree' (noun_noun) instead of something like 'get_component_tree'. Also 'search_my_sonarqube_projects' uses an awkward 'my' qualifier. Overall, the naming is predictable and readable, with only minor inconsistencies.

    Tool Count5/5

    15 tools is at the upper end of the ideal 3-15 range but well-scoped for a SonarCloud server covering projects, issues, hotspots, and quality gates. Each tool serves a distinct need, and none feel redundant or superfluous. The count is appropriate for the breadth of the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides good read coverage for projects, components, issues, hotspots, and quality gates, plus write capability for hotspot status changes. Minor gaps include the absence of an update-issue tool (e.g., to resolve or reassign issues) and no create/modify/delete operations for quality gates or projects. These are workable gaps since the server seems focused on analysis and reporting, but agents may need to work around the missing issue-update capability.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues