Prop Trading MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPT_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for Take Profit Trader | |
| APEX_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for Apex Trader Funding | |
| MFFU_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for MyFundedFutures | |
| ALPHA_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for Alpha Futures | |
| ELITE_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for Elite Trader Funding | |
| LUCID_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for Lucid Trading | |
| BLUSKY_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for BluSky Trading | |
| BULENOX_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for Bulenox | |
| TOPSTEP_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for Topstep | |
| TRADEDAY_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for TradeDay | |
| TRADEIFY_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for Tradeify | |
| EARN2TRADE_AFFILIATE_ID | No | Affiliate ID for Earn2Trade |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_firmsA | List all available futures prop trading firms with summary information. Returns firm name, Trustpilot rating, monthly fee, and key strength for each of 12 firms. |
| get_firmB | Get detailed information about a specific futures prop trading firm. Includes pricing, profit split, rules, payout speed, platforms, and referral link. Valid slugs: apex, topstep, mffu, tradeday, blusky, tpt, earn2trade, elite, bulenox, alpha, tradeify, lucid |
| compare_firmsA | Compare 2-4 futures prop trading firms side-by-side. Returns a comparison table with key metrics like fees, profit split, payout speed, and rules. Optionally specify which metrics to compare. |
| search_firmsB | Search and filter futures prop trading firms by criteria. Filter by budget, payment type, Trustpilot rating, consistency rules, overnight holding, activation fees, and payout speed. |
| recommendB | Get personalized futures prop firm recommendations based on trader preferences. This is the core recommendation engine that analyzes experience, budget, trading style, concerns, and dealbreakers to find the best-matching firms. Returns top 3 recommendations with match reasons, warnings, and referral links. |
| get_quiz_questionsA | Get all quiz questions for conducting an interactive prop firm recommendation quiz. Returns 9 questions with options, descriptions, and metadata. Use this to walk users through the quiz step-by-step, then call the recommend tool with their answers. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
The tools mostly target distinct needs: get_firm (single detail), list_firms (all summaries), search_firms (filtered), compare_firms (side-by-side), recommend (personalized), and get_quiz_questions (quiz data). The main overlap is between list_firms and search_firms, since searching with no criteria effectively produces a list, but descriptions clarify the boundaries well enough.
Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (get_firm, compare_firms, search_firms, list_firms, get_quiz_questions). The lone deviation is 'recommend', which is a bare verb without a noun, but it is still readable and unambiguous.
Six tools is well-scoped for a prop firm comparison and recommendation service. Each tool handles a distinct operation (list, detail, search, compare, recommend, quiz) with no redundant entries.
The surface covers the full lifecycle of the domain: browsing (list/search), inspecting (get_firm), comparing (compare_firms), personalized matching (recommend plus get_quiz_questions), with referral links surfaced. No obvious gaps remain for the stated purpose.