A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceConnects Claude to a project-management account so it can list and manage projects, tasks, comments, and files through eight REST API tools, including creating and updating tasks and adding comments.
MIT
System Task MCP
by luis1amaral
Related Servers
Alternatives to System Task MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes task management as MCP tools, letting Claude list, create, and complete tasks and projects directly.1 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with Super Productivity's local REST API for task, project, and tag management, including CRUD operations, status checks, and daily planning prompts.17976 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to read and update tasks in the Nexus/TaskBridge project management system through its public API.109 npmISC
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with Things 3 task management, allowing natural language task creation, project analysis, and GTD workflow automation.2424 PyPI44MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates task management capabilities into Claude Desktop, enabling users to create, track, search, and manage tasks with status updates, team assignments, overdue tracking, and automated standup reports.6MIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 15 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: team lists vs. team load, project overview vs. report vs. risks, task search vs. task get, and create for self vs. create for others. Descriptions explicitly cross-reference to avoid overlap, so an agent can reliably pick the right tool.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools share the 'systemtask_' prefix and use snake_case, with most following a 'resource_action' pattern (e.g., task_get, task_update, demand_create). Minor deviations like 'day_brief', 'project_report', 'project_risks', and 'whoami' break the pattern slightly but remain readable and identifiable.
Tool Count5/5
With 15 tools, the set is well-scoped for its domain. Each tool serves a clear purpose—from project overviews and team load to full task lifecycle operations—without redundancy. The count sits at the upper end of the ideal range but feels justified.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers project monitoring, team awareness, personal planning, and a full task lifecycle (search, get, create, update, assign, move, comment). The lack of delete and subtask editing is intentional and documented, so agents can work around it, but these are still minor gaps.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues