Skip to main content
Glama
lucidopus

codeglance-mcp

by lucidopus
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to codeglance-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • gpal

      tobert
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives your IDE or agent access to Google Gemini with autonomous codebase exploration, enabling deep code analysis, architectural reviews, and bug hunting.
      20
      10
      MIT

    • Codelens-MCP

      Yashkashte5
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives Claude Desktop complete intelligence about any public GitHub repository. Research libraries, compare packages, audit dependencies, and explore codebases through natural conversation.
      1
      MIT

    • revibe-mcp

      selvatuple
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables analysis of any GitHub repository to get architecture, file roles, execution flows, system design Q\&A, and structured agent context. Works with MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and Windsurf.
      6
      28 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: analyzing a repository, checking its status, and listing output guides. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (analyze_repository, get_repository_info, list_generated_guides) making predictions easy.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools are slightly on the lower end for a code analysis server, but they cover the essential workflow without being excessive. The count is reasonable.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover the core analysis and listing workflow, but lack retrieval of individual guide content, deletion, or configuration options, which are notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources