Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to pentest-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Records your terminal sessions per command (PTY + OSC 133) into local SQLite, so AI agents can search, retrieve, and diff what commands actually printed. Secret redaction is applied by default to everything served over MCP.
      4
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to query a dated, provenance-backed history distilled from any text stream, turning raw records into observations, bi-temporal facets, and narratives over MCP.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP-compatible agent to query a local OpenRhyme activity timeline, search history, and issue control commands over stdio while keeping all data on-machine.
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-based communication with existing interactive terminal channels, such as shells or agent CLIs, by listing, reading, writing text, and sending control signals to tmux sessions without creating or managing them.
      7
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to observe and, when explicitly enabled, send constrained input to whitelisted tmux sessions, with support for local STDIO and loopback-only HTTP transport behind an authenticated tunnel.
      13
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables searching and reading local Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex session transcripts from any MCP client, with fuzzy, regex, and full-text search, plus optional semantic search.
      12
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: listing vs getting vs updating findings/tasks/entities, searching, tracing provenance, recording observations. No two tools appear to do the same thing, and overlaps like list_findings vs get_finding are cleanly separated by collection vs singleton semantics.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lowercase_verb_noun pattern (get_, list_, search, record_, update_). Verbs are uniform and actions are clear from names alone, with no camelCase or mixed conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    15 tools is well within the ideal range for a specialized MCP server. Each tool serves a distinct purpose in the penetration-testing workflow (observation, analysis, status management, provenance), with no redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full investigation lifecycle: capture review, entity management, finding workflow (candidate/confirm/reject), task tracking, provenance tracing, and operator note-taking. Minor gaps exist (no explicit engagement creation/deletion or direct entity editing), but these are addressable via record_observation and do not create dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues