week_aheadGenerates a seven-day astrological forecast covering the week ahead, helping you plan around upcoming cosmic influences and daily planetary shifts.
Pronóstico astrológico de los próximos siete días.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must carry the full behavioral burden. It only identifies the tool as an astrological forecast for the next seven days; it discloses nothing about read-only nature, caching, rate limits, authentication, or response behavior beyond the stated temporal scope.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with zero waste. It directly states the purpose without extraneous detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a parameterless tool with an output schema, the description adequately states the core purpose. However, it omits sibling differentiation and usage context, which are important given the presence of similar horoscope tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool accepts zero parameters, so by rule the baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter information, but none is needed since the input schema is empty and fully specified.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a clear resource and scope: 'Astrological forecast for the next seven days.' It is specific enough for an agent to know what the tool provides, but it does not differentiate from sibling tools like weekly_horoscope or daily_horoscope, which may overlap in function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as weekly_horoscope, daily_horoscope, or monthly_horoscope. The description simply states what it is, leaving usage conditions to inference.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.