clickup_list_doc_pages
Retrieve all pages within a given ClickUp Doc or Wiki by providing its doc ID.
Instructions
List pages inside a ClickUp Doc or Wiki
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes |
Retrieve all pages within a given ClickUp Doc or Wiki by providing its doc ID.
List pages inside a ClickUp Doc or Wiki
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as pagination, error handling, required authentication, or whether the listing is flat or hierarchical. This leaves the agent uninformed about important operational details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise (one sentence) but at the expense of informativeness. It fails to earn its place by providing necessary guidance for correct invocation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with one parameter and no annotations or output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It omits details about return format, pagination, errors, and how to handle the required doc_id.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description should compensate but does not. The only parameter, 'doc_id', is not explained (e.g., format, how to obtain it). The description adds no meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('List') and the resource ('pages inside a ClickUp Doc or Wiki'), distinguishing it from siblings like clickup_list_docs (which lists docs, not pages). It is specific and not tautological.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., clickup_list_docs for top-level docs). The description only states what it does, without any context on prerequisites or suitable scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lucaspsantana/clickup-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server