Skip to main content
Glama
lucasgris

CiteCheck MCP

by lucasgris
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to CiteCheck MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • citation-check

      arhancanli
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables verifying citations in reference lists and BibTeX by detecting fabricated or mismatched references and retractions, and returning corrected BibTeX.
      3
      MIT

    • TheGenie

      ehsanghorbani190
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI writing assistants to retrieve citable evidence from local PDFs and verify draft citations against their sources locally, providing verifiable support for claims.
      2
      1
      MIT

    • ares-mcp

      benetche
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides local academic literature search and writing support by querying OpenAlex, arXiv, and Crossref, downloading open-access PDFs, extracting IMRaD sections, and appending BibTeX references.
      4
      2
      MIT
    • CiteStamp MCP server by citestamp

      CiteStamp MCP serverofficial

      citestamp
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Ground citations before your agent emits them by checking references against public scholarly registries and flagging hallucinated or retracted ones.
      MIT

    • Reviewer Zero

      Rishab-Ghosh
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables pre-submission review of ML papers inside Claude Code or Claude Desktop by checking format and anonymization risks, resolving every reference, finding prior work for each claim, verifying quotes against the PDF, and running methodology and writing checks. It reports findings only, never scores, ratings, or accept/reject verdicts, and never rewrites the author's text.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: verify_quote checks, find_evidence ranks, and record_verdict persists, while read_source, open_project, fetch_sources, and attach_pdf all target different resource stages. The rewrite lifecycle (propose_rewrite, propose_insertion, apply_rewrite, revert_rewrite, discard_rewrite, list_rewrites) is also cleanly separated by action.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (verify_quote, open_project, list_claims, apply_rewrite, etc.). There are no mixed conventions or vague verbs; even the rewrite variants follow a predictable propose/apply/revert/discard/list scheme.

    Tool Count4/5

    19 tools is on the heavy side of the ideal 3-15 range, but the domain (citation checking of a manuscript) is genuinely multi-stage and each tool earns its place. No redundant tools inflate the count.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full workflow: opening a project, listing/getting claims, verifying and recording verdicts, bibliography checks, source fetching, rewrite proposal through rollback, and report export. Minor gaps like closing/archiving a project or a search-within-bibliography helper exist but are workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources