Skip to main content
Glama
lucasgris

CiteCheck MCP

by lucasgris
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to CiteCheck MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • paper-preflight

      amos689
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Checks every reference of a LaTeX paper against Crossref, dblp, arXiv, DataCite, PubMed and OpenAlex records: whether each cited work exists, whether its metadata matches, and whether it was retracted. Read-only tools confined to the workspace, with no LLM in the verdict.
      5
      276 PyPI
      94
      MIT

    • io.github.Hylouis233/bibverify

      ozkan40
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and researchers to verify BibTeX entries against Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, arXiv and other sources using identifier-first, explainable multi-signal matching. It reports metadata consistency, conflicts, and ambiguous or missing records, and can apply high-confidence field updates non-destructively with backups.
      -

    • io.github.Hylouis233/bibverify

      Chenle88236
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to check BibTeX records for bibliographic existence and metadata consistency by querying identifier-first providers like Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, DBLP, and arXiv and scoring title, author, year, venue, and page evidence. It returns explainable outcomes such as matches, ambiguous or not-found entries, and identifier conflicts, while keeping edits non-destructive unless explicitly applied.
      -

    • io.github.Hylouis233/bibverify

      hassan4655
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to verify bibliographic existence and metadata consistency in BibTeX files through identifier-first lookups and explainable multi-source matching without destructive edits. It surfaces structured outcomes for missing, ambiguous, or conflicting references and supports non-destructive, high-confidence updates.
      -

    • io.github.Hylouis233/bibverify

      erikk909
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to verify bibliographic records and BibTeX metadata consistency by resolving DOI, PMID, PMCID, and arXiv identifiers and scoring candidates across multiple scholarly sources with explainable, multi-signal matching. It reports structured provider outcomes and metadata conflicts without destructively editing the source bibliography.
      -

    • citation-check

      arhancanli
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables verifying citations in reference lists and BibTeX by detecting fabricated or mismatched references and retractions, and returning corrected BibTeX.
      3
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: verify_quote checks, find_evidence ranks, and record_verdict persists, while read_source, open_project, fetch_sources, and attach_pdf all target different resource stages. The rewrite lifecycle (propose_rewrite, propose_insertion, apply_rewrite, revert_rewrite, discard_rewrite, list_rewrites) is also cleanly separated by action.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (verify_quote, open_project, list_claims, apply_rewrite, etc.). There are no mixed conventions or vague verbs; even the rewrite variants follow a predictable propose/apply/revert/discard/list scheme.

    Tool Count4/5

    19 tools is on the heavy side of the ideal 3-15 range, but the domain (citation checking of a manuscript) is genuinely multi-stage and each tool earns its place. No redundant tools inflate the count.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the full workflow: opening a project, listing/getting claims, verifying and recording verdicts, bibliography checks, source fetching, rewrite proposal through rollback, and report export. Minor gaps like closing/archiving a project or a search-within-bibliography helper exist but are workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources