Skip to main content
Glama
lucas-moont

mcp-lab-00-raw-protocol

by lucas-moont

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-lab-00-raw-protocol

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A learning-oriented MCP server that exposes basic tools (echo, add, reverse) over stdio transport to validate MCP handshake and tool calls.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to call an add tool that sums two numbers over stdio, with a roadmap for adding more tools, validation, real APIs, and error handling.
      1
      1 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A model-agnostic MCP server exposing example tools (add1, multiply2, greet) for learning purposes, working with any LLM through stdio transport.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to perform addition calculations through a stdio-based MCP server with an add_numbers tool and type-safe validation.
      72 npm
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A minimal Model Context Protocol server that provides a simple tool for adding two integers. It serves as a demonstration of the official Python MCP SDK and is designed for local execution via stdio.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal MCP server that exposes tools for addition, echoing text, time lookup, and URL fetching, with support for HTTP and stdio transports.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    Only one tool exists, so there is no possibility of overlapping or ambiguous tool purposes. The single 'add' tool has a clear, singular function.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tool name 'add' is clear, concise, and uses a lowercase verb style. With only one tool, there is no established pattern to fully evaluate, but the naming is appropriate and unambiguous.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool feels minimal and thin for most practical use cases. It is not necessarily inappropriate for a very narrow addition-only server, but the count is at the borderline lower end.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set only supports addition. If the intended domain is basic arithmetic, significant operations such as subtraction, multiplication, and division are missing, leaving substantial gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues