opn_add_dnsmasq_range

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must cover behavioral traits. It mentions 'apply the configuration' indicating a side effect, but does not disclose permissions needed, potential conflicts, reversibility, or what happens on failure. This is insufficient for a configuration mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences: first states the core action and effect, second provides usage context. Every sentence is necessary and front-loaded. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (7 parameters, optional RA), the description adequately covers purpose and IPv4/v6 distinction. It does not explain return values (output schema exists) or error conditions, but it is sufficient for a create operation with good schema documentation. Slightly incomplete for a high-complexity tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are well-documented in the schema. The description adds minimal extra value beyond the schema, like clarifying 'apply the configuration'. It does not explain parameter dependencies or provide extensive additional context. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (create) and resource (dnsmasq DHCP range) with the specific verbs 'Create' and 'apply'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like opn_delete_dnsmasq_range and opn_update_dnsmasq_range by specifying 'add' and describing DHCP range creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this to add DHCPv4 or DHCPv6 address ranges with optional Router Advertisement (RA) configuration', providing clear context for usage. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or mention alternatives among siblings, though the sibling names imply distinct roles.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.