Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-memoria

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to store, search, and retrieve long-term memory as plain Markdown files with a disposable SQLite index, including note management, decision/bug tracking, and codebase symbol lookup via MCP.
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP hosts to query locally indexed notes, docs, chat logs, and other files via hybrid vector/BM25 retrieval with section-level citations. Exposes tools, resources, and prompts for searching and asking over the indexed content.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to search their own and other agents' sessions and existing Markdown memories locally through MCP, returning provenance-tagged fragments while keeping source files read-only. Indexing, embeddings, and reranking all run locally behind a single daemon with a SQLite index.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Exposes a stdio MCP server that indexes a markdown vault (such as an Obsidian folder of notes) into SQLite FTS5 and answers BM25-ranked section-level queries, with filters for note type. It also exposes reindexing so notes edited on disk become searchable again, giving coding agents persistent, durable memory across sessions.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and MCP hosts to search and question a local, hybrid-indexed corpus of scattered notes, docs, and chat logs, returning section-level citations rather than whole files.
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage of the memory lifecycle: listing sources, searching, expanding a citation, writing a new note, and rebuilding the index. There is no plausible confusion between them, and the descriptions explicitly chain them (buscar_memoria → leer_fragmento, listar_fuentes before searching).

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Four of five names follow a clear Spanish verb_noun pattern (listar_fuentes, buscar_memoria, leer_fragmento, guardar_nota). reindexar is a bare verb without a noun, a minor deviation but still readable and unambiguous.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped surface for a personal memory/index server; each maps to a real operation with no filler. Nothing feels thin because the read/write/search/reindex loop is fully covered.

    Completeness4/5

    The core loop (inspect index, search, read, write, reindex) is covered, including deduplication on write and incremental reindexing. There is no explicit way to delete or edit an existing note, so stale memories can only be removed via file changes plus reindexing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues