Skip to main content
Glama
luanpdd

kit-mcp

by luanpdd
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to kit-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ProPlan

      King-Proplan
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for project planning inside Claude. It tracks progress, knows your codebase, and resumes exactly where you left off every session.
      5 npm
      5
      -

    • agent-intern

      SinanTufekci
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that bridges Claude Code with Antigravity CLI using a Swarm Agent architecture to optimize local development workflows and minimize LLM token costs. Includes a web UI for monitoring agent workflows.
      29
      235 PyPI
      26
      MIT

    • project-memory-mcp

      kaaustubh
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local MCP server giving AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code/JetBrains Copilot) a shared, persistent memory of your projects and every bug/issue faced during development. Stateless, plain-file storage (AGENTS.md + issues.jsonl) — no database.
      16
      54 npm
      1
      MIT

    • bwa

      PiwPiyolett
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and other coding agents to a project's idea, feature topology, and ordered task queue over MCP, so they can answer planning jobs, claim, build, and tick off implementation tasks live in your repository, or assemble a shareable PRD.
      4 npm
      MIT

    • Vibecoders MCP

      RaedBerjaoui
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      One MCP that turns Claude Code into your whole dev stack by swallowing other MCP servers, delegating to Codex & Gemini on your CLI subscriptions, remembering projects in a searchable knowledge graph, and carrying setup across sessions — secret-free by design.
      23
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but the five cost-related tools (cost-blocks, cost-estimate, cost-phase, cost-session, cost-today) could cause confusion despite scope differentiation. Descriptions help, but the domain overlap is notable.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use lowercase with hyphens, but the semantic pattern is inconsistent: verb-noun (ack-restart, auto-install), noun-noun (cost-blocks, metrics-snapshot), and single-word (install, kit, sync). Mixed conventions reduce predictability.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is slightly above the ideal 3–15 range but still reasonable. The set covers multiple sub-domains (cost, kit management, projects), though some tools like forensics and gates feel vague.

    Completeness3/5

    The cost tools provide tracking but lack budgeting or forecasting. Kit management has sync and reverse-sync but no create/update for agents/skills/commands. Projects tool is limited to listing and validation; lifecycle operations are missing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources