Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ObsidianConnector

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive access to Obsidian vaults through MCP, supporting multi-vault management, knowledge graph analysis, canvas manipulation, dataview queries, template rendering, and periodic notes creation. Provides both local filesystem and remote API connectivity for complete Obsidian integration.
      29
      6,222 npm
      22
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and development tools to interact with Obsidian vaults via MCP, providing direct filesystem access for reading, writing, searching, and managing notes without requiring Obsidian to be running.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI hosts to read, search, link, and write notes in a local Obsidian vault with sandboxed file access.
      1
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to interact with Obsidian vaults via filesystem operations and optional REST API integration for advanced UI commands. It features multi-vault auto-discovery, concurrent-safe file handling, and comprehensive tools for searching, reading, and managing vault content.
      12
      6,222 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search, read, list, and append to markdown notes in a local Obsidian vault or folder of .md files.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to remotely access and interact with Obsidian vaults via MCP, supporting note operations, tag management, graph queries, and command execution.
      4
      GPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clear resource-action boundaries (e.g., read_note vs get_frontmatter vs search_notes). A few pairs like list_notes/list_directory and get_project_context/get_project_activity could cause initial confusion but descriptions resolve them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern, with verbs like get, list, create, update, delete, search, move, append. No mixed conventions.

    Tool Count3/5

    22 tools fall into the heavy range (16-25). While each tool has a specific function, the overall surface is broad and might be more than needed for typical Obsidian workflows.

    Completeness4/5

    Note lifecycle is fully covered (create/read/update/append/delete/search), plus vault registration and frontmatter handling. Missing directory deletion/rename and note metadata operations, but these are minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues