Strava MCP server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Strava MCP server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA read-only local MCP server for querying your own Strava data from Codex, providing tools for activities, athlete profile, stats, gear, and more.1610 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables users to access Strava fitness data, including user activities, activity details, segments, and leaderboards through a structured API interface.34MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides language models with access to Strava API data, allowing them to query and analyze athlete activities from Strava.424MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables language models to interact with Strava data, including activities, athlete statistics, routes, achievements, and social features.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that exposes Strava API v3 data (activities, segments, routes, clubs, gear, streams) as tools for any MCP client. Read-only by default, with an optional --write flag to enable mutating operations.10 npm1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes Strava v3 API as read-only tools for AI agents. It covers athlete profiles, activities, stats, routes, segments, and rate limits, with OAuth2 authorization handled via a companion HTTP server.20-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools are clearly distinct: one returns the athlete profile, one lists activities, and one returns a single activity's detail. Minor potential confusion between list_my_activities and get_activity, but their purposes are obvious and descriptions clarify the distinction.
All tools use a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_my_profile, list_my_activities, get_activity) with snake_case throughout. Minor inconsistency: 'my' is included in two names but not in get_activity, which slightly breaks the symmetry.
Three tools is on the lower end of the acceptable range and feels thin for a server covering an activity-tracking platform like Strava. It's borderline — sufficient to demonstrate the server works, but not a rich surface.
The surface only offers read operations: profile retrieval, activity listing, and activity detail. Notable gaps include no ability to create/upload activities, update activity records (e.g., change title or privacy), delete activities, manage segments, access clubs, or handle friends/athletes. It's a purely read-only view with no lifecycle operations.