kanban.board
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_boardsA | List the GitHub Projects v2 boards the user tracks. |
| get_boardA | Read one board: its Status columns and every issue/PR card on it. |
| board_summaryA | Summarise a board as counts per column, plus its total card count. Cheaper for the model to reason over than the full card list when the question is "where does the work stand?". |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a distinct role: discovering boards, reading a full board, and producing a column summary. Descriptions clarify when to use board_summary vs get_board, so there is no ambiguity.
list_boards and get_board follow a clear verb_noun pattern, but board_summary uses a noun phrase instead. The names remain readable and consistent in domain terminology, but this small deviation makes the set mostly consistent rather than fully uniform.
With three tools, the server is tightly scoped to reading and summarizing Kanban boards. Each tool has a clear purpose, and the count feels appropriate rather than excessive or thin.
The tools cover board discovery, full board retrieval, and aggregate summaries, which is complete for a read-only Kanban workflow. The absence of write operations (create/update/move) is a notable gap if broader board management is expected, but for the stated tracking purpose the surface is sufficient.