Skip to main content
Glama
lovelyXiaoQi

mcdk-mcp-tracy

by lovelyXiaoQi
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcdk-mcp-tracy

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • javaperf

      theSharque
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for profiling Java applications via JDK utilities (jcmd, jfr, jps). Enables AI assistants to diagnose performance, analyze threads, and inspect JFR recordings without manual CLI usage.
      26
      46 npm
      10
      MIT

    • Observability MCP Server

      sandraschi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive monitoring and observability for MCP server ecosystems with real-time health checks, performance metrics, distributed tracing, anomaly detection, and automated performance reports using OpenTelemetry and Prometheus.
      1
      MIT

    • msprof-mcp

      Krusty84
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for analyzing Ascend PyTorch Profiler performance data. Enables users to identify performance bottlenecks, analyze operator time, view communication overhead, and query trace data via natural language.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: checking readiness, listing captures, capturing, querying costs, diffing captures, and monitoring frame health. No overlapping functionalities.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the consistent 'tracy_' prefix followed by a verb_noun pattern (e.g., tracy_status, tracy_list_captures, tracy_native_capture, tracy_get_function_costs, tracy_diff_captures, tracy_jank_fps).

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools cover the profiling domain comprehensively without being excessive. Each tool is essential for the core workflow: readiness check, capture, query, diff, and frame-level analysis.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main profiling workflow (status, capture, costs, diff, frame health). A minor gap is the lack of a tool to delete or manage stored captures, but the set is complete for common tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources