Skip to main content
Glama
lovec-tech

lovec-mcp

Official
by lovec-tech

Related Servers

Alternatives to lovec-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a local, read-only MCP server that scans untrusted text for prompt-injection and returns an allow/review/block decision with evidence. It runs entirely on-device with no network requests and redacts sensitive strings by default.
      50 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides tools to scan text and URLs for prompt injection attacks, protecting AI agents from adversarial inputs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Scans MCP tool descriptions for prompt injection attacks, including cross-tool instructions, privilege escalation, and data exfiltration patterns. It can be used as a CLI scanner or integrated as an MCP server itself.
      182 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server exposing prompt-shield's prompt-injection firewall for LLM applications. Four tools — scan_input, scan_output, scan_tool_result (with optional sanitization), and list_detectors — backed by 34+ detectors and a federated ed25519-signed threat feed.
      16
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server to scan a repository for hidden prompt injection payloads and return a REFUSE/WARN/OK verdict, allowing AI agents to gate their own trust.
      33 npm
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal Model Context Protocol server that provides a safety guardrail tool to check if provided context is free from code injection or harmful content.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusion or misselection. The description also clearly scopes what the tool does and does not do, which removes boundary ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool name check_prompt_injection follows a clear verb_noun pattern and is immediately understandable. With a single tool, there is no inconsistent naming across a set to worry about.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool is at the low end of a useful MCP surface and feels thin as a tool set. However, for a narrowly scoped prompt-injection detection service, one focused tool can be acceptable.

    Completeness4/5

    For the stated purpose of checking untrusted text for prompt-injection risk, the core operation is fully covered and returns actionable output. Minor gaps such as batch checking or usage/balance lookup exist, but agents can work around them by calling the tool repeatedly.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues