ifcx_add_spatial_structure

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations and a description that only points to another tool, behavioral traits are completely opaque. The agent cannot infer side effects, prerequisites, or safety characteristics from the definition.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While extremely concise, the description is under-specified for a tool with 11 parameters and no schema descriptions. It fails to be informative, which undermines the purpose of conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the high parameter count, missing output schema, and lack of annotations, the description is completely inadequate. The agent has no context about return values, required parameters beyond sessionId, or how parameters relate to spatial structure creation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no parameter information. Eleven parameters, including many with ambiguous names like 'projectName', 'siteName', remain entirely unexplained, leaving the agent unable to construct valid inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description merely states it is an alias for ifcx_create_spatial_structure, indirectly hinting at a purpose but not explicitly defining what the tool does. It fails to differentiate from the sibling tool ifcx_create_spatial_structure, leaving the agent uncertain about when to use this vs. the original.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool or when to avoid it. The description does not specify conditions, alternatives, or exclusions, offering no decision support to the agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.