Skip to main content
Glama
louislaurent1

Kryve Agent Evaluation MCP

by louislaurent1
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Kryve Agent Evaluation MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • AgentOps EvalBench MCP

      AbhinavVarma02
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM evaluation and observability by uploading documents, building test sets, running RAG pipelines, and automatically scoring answers for groundedness, hallucination risk, retrieval quality, latency, and cost, with tools exposed to MCP-compatible clients.
      1
      MIT

    • testing-toolkit-mcp

      byreshb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides coding agents with visibility into test health through tools for flaky test detection, test quality linting, and LLM evaluation harness, enabling them to triage failures, review test quality, and check prompt changes for regressions.
      9
      Apache 2.0

    • io.github.loopg/pramana-mcp

      reliai-in
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets an assistant read recorded production AI agent runs — steps, model and tool calls with arguments, and outcomes — along with the findings of comparison runs that checked a prompt or model change against those recordings, and verify a signed evidence bundle offline with no account or network. It is strictly read-only: no tool starts a replay or comparison, so nothing can spend money or act without a person deciding.
      5
      43 PyPI
      Apache 2.0
    • Coval MCP Server by coval-ai

      Coval MCP Serverofficial

      coval-ai
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Coval's evaluation platform for launching and monitoring evaluation runs, managing agents and test sets, and retrieving evaluation metrics.
      18
      14 npm
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool addresses a distinct phase of evaluation: generating test plans, scoring an agent run, and retrieving a scorecard structure. There is no functional overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Two tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (generate_test_plan, score_agent_run), but evaluation_scorecard is noun-led rather than verb-led. The inconsistency is minor and all names remain readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is an appropriate, focused scope for an evaluation-oriented MCP server. Each tool serves a core need without bloat, making the surface easy to navigate.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers planning, assessment, and structure retrieval, but lacks an explicit verification or finalization tool. The 'unverified' caveat on score_agent_run hints at this gap, but the core workflow is still functional.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources