base-security-scanner-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to base-security-scanner-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePay-per-use AI security and research tools for autonomous agents on Base, enabling honeypot detection, risk assessment, wallet analysis, and yield optimization via the x402 protocol.-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceThe safety layer that checks a DeFi transaction or token before your agent (or you) signs — on Base L2.632 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceToken safety oracle for AI agents. Honeypot detection, 17 scam pattern checks, LP lock verification across 6 EVM chains. Score 0-100 with risk flags. ERC Token Safety Score standard.1MIT

AgentRisk MCPofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents on Base to call a check_token_risk tool before trading, providing honeypot detection, LP-lock verification, brand impersonation checks, and live sell simulation across Uniswap V2/V3/V4 and Aerodrome with a clear risk score and should-trade decision.110 npmMIT- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenancebasescope is a read-only onchain safety layer for AI agents: it answers "is this token/contract/approval safe?" on Base and EVM chains (honeypot/rug checks, risky-approval detection, verified-source lookup, balances, ENS/Basenames, gas, prices), with no private keys and no required API keys.137 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceQuick-scan a smart contract for rug, honeypot, or centralization risk before sending funds. It combines verified source, live on-chain state, and heuristic Solidity analysis to return a SAFE/CAUTION/HIGH-RISK verdict.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: analyze_bytecode identifies patterns, audit_report generates comprehensive reports, check_honeypot simulates trading, check_token_permissions examines ownership controls, compare_bytecode detects clones, detect_rug_risk scores risk, get_contract_info retrieves metadata, and scan_contract analyzes security issues. The descriptions precisely differentiate their functions, eliminating any ambiguity.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, such as analyze_bytecode, check_honeypot, and detect_rug_risk. This uniformity makes the set predictable and easy to navigate, with no deviations in style or structure across the eight tools.
With 8 tools, the count is well-scoped for a security scanner focused on Base mainnet smart contracts. Each tool serves a specific, necessary function in the domain, from basic metadata retrieval to advanced risk analysis, without being excessive or insufficient for the server's purpose.
The tool set provides complete coverage for smart contract security analysis on Base mainnet, including bytecode analysis, honeypot detection, permission checks, risk scoring, contract comparison, metadata retrieval, and comprehensive scanning. There are no obvious gaps; agents can perform end-to-end security assessments without dead ends.