Skip to main content
Glama
lordbasilaiassistant-sudo

base-security-scanner-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to base-security-scanner-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Token safety oracle for AI agents. Honeypot detection, 17 scam pattern checks, LP lock verification across 6 EVM chains. Score 0-100 with risk flags. ERC Token Safety Score standard.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents on Base to call a check_token_risk tool before trading, providing honeypot detection, LP-lock verification, brand impersonation checks, and live sell simulation across Uniswap V2/V3/V4 and Aerodrome with a clear risk score and should-trade decision.
      1
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      basescope is a read-only onchain safety layer for AI agents: it answers "is this token/contract/approval safe?" on Base and EVM chains (honeypot/rug checks, risky-approval detection, verified-source lookup, balances, ENS/Basenames, gas, prices), with no private keys and no required API keys.
      13
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Quick-scan a smart contract for rug, honeypot, or centralization risk before sending funds. It combines verified source, live on-chain state, and heuristic Solidity analysis to return a SAFE/CAUTION/HIGH-RISK verdict.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: analyze_bytecode identifies patterns, audit_report generates comprehensive reports, check_honeypot simulates trading, check_token_permissions examines ownership controls, compare_bytecode detects clones, detect_rug_risk scores risk, get_contract_info retrieves metadata, and scan_contract analyzes security issues. The descriptions precisely differentiate their functions, eliminating any ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, such as analyze_bytecode, check_honeypot, and detect_rug_risk. This uniformity makes the set predictable and easy to navigate, with no deviations in style or structure across the eight tools.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the count is well-scoped for a security scanner focused on Base mainnet smart contracts. Each tool serves a specific, necessary function in the domain, from basic metadata retrieval to advanced risk analysis, without being excessive or insufficient for the server's purpose.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete coverage for smart contract security analysis on Base mainnet, including bytecode analysis, honeypot detection, permission checks, risk scoring, contract comparison, metadata retrieval, and comprehensive scanning. There are no obvious gaps; agents can perform end-to-end security assessments without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues