base-escrow-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to base-escrow-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Pact, an escrow protocol for agent-to-agent commerce, enabling agents to create pacts, fund escrow, deliver work, and settle with an LLM evaluator as dispute backstop.13 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for creating, settling, disputing, and refunding escrows on EVM chains.86 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Taskmarket that enables AI agents to discover, claim, submit, and track on-chain bounty tasks on the Base-based decentralized task marketplace, including wallet operations, pitch systems, and submission management.61 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that connects AI agents to the Taskmarket onchain marketplace on Base, enabling them to browse bounties, claim tasks, submit deliverables, and manage their wallet.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for agentic commerce, enabling AI agents to discover services, make x402 payments with USDC across multiple chains, and manage crypto wallets and token swaps.335 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Taskmarket onchain task marketplace on Base L2. Enables AI agents to discover, browse, create, claim, and submit work to Taskmarket through natural language.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool has a distinct purpose: get_deal retrieves by ID, get_buyer_deals and get_seller_deals filter by role, get_escrow_info provides contract metadata, and create/release/refund/dispute handle lifecycle actions. No two tools overlap ambiguously.
All query tools follow a get_* pattern, and all action tools use the *_escrow suffix. The verb-noun structure is consistent throughout, making the API predictable and easy to navigate.
With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for an escrow management domain. Each tool covers a core operation or query without redundancy or bloat.
The tool set covers the full escrow lifecycle: creation, release, refund, and dispute, along with sufficient query capabilities (by ID, buyer, seller, and contract info). No obvious gaps exist for common use cases.