Skip to main content
Glama
loqmen-anani

dataroom

by loqmen-anani
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to dataroom

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Precedent

      insha-parveen
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to search and retrieve contract intelligence over public contract data, with agent skills for precedent lookup, negotiation checks, and risk flagging, all with verification and citations.
      -

    • lexrag

      SECINTS
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables retrieval-augmented question answering over EU AI Act and NIS-2 legal texts via MCP tools, with hybrid search and verified article-level citations.
      -

    • mcp-rag-bridge

      zyay
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query and manage a document knowledge base via MCP, with RAG-powered search and grounded answers with citations.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: search_data_room locates contracts or articles via filters/full-text search, while get_contract retrieves the complete text of a specific contract. There is no overlap in functionality, so an agent can easily select the right tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: search_data_room and get_contract. The verbs (search, get) clearly indicate the action, and the nouns refer to the domain resources in a predictable way.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the set is on the thin side for a data room server that might involve contract management, metadata browsing, and article-level access. While the two tools cover the core read operations, the count feels minimal and borderline for the apparent scope.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the essential read lifecycle: search/filter contracts and retrieve full contract text with articles. Minor gaps exist, such as direct article-level retrieval or explicit metadata-only queries, but agents can work around these using the provided tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources