android-reserve-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to android-reserve-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to inspect Android APKs, device state, runtime behavior, resources, and native libraries locally, returning findings with supporting evidence, coverage, limitations, and unknowns.369,596 npm2MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables local-first static and optional controlled dynamic analysis of Android APK artifacts, with provenance-aware downloads, Markdown reports, and structured security findings via MCP stdio tools.9-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables offline Android package analysis by loading APK, DEX, JAR, class, and XAPK files to inspect app metadata, manifests, classes, methods, resources, strings, and cross-references, and to export decompiled Java sources through CRUDE MCP-AQL tools.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Codex users to query an evidence-backed Android reference atlas, inspect projects, plan APK/firmware investigations and acceptance work, check explicit contracts, and analyze supplied frame captures through thirteen local read-only tools.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to inspect APKs and resources, analyze native libraries, trace runtime behavior with Frida, and connect app screen actions to code through ADB.89MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables mobile application penetration testing with 83+ tools covering Frida instrumentation, APK analysis, decompilation, signing, emulator support, and system compatibility checks.1-
TDQS
Scored across 20 tools
Most tools target distinct resources (dex, native, frida, webview, resources, script), and several descriptions explicitly disambiguate neighbors (search is not DEX xref, native vs frida static/dynamic). However the `artifact` (content-based identification/extraction) vs `artifacts` (list/read task files) pair is a near-collision that will cause misselection, and `apk`/`packages`/`decode` plus `framework`/`managed` have overlapping edges that only the long descriptions disentangle.
Naming is consistently lowercase single tokens throughout, which is readable, but it never encodes an action (no verb_noun pattern) so the operation must be inferred from the description. Singular/plural collisions (`artifact` vs `artifacts`) and role-mixed tokens (`doctor`, `guidance`, `jobs`) weaken predictability.
20 tools is at the heavy end, though the domain genuinely spans static analysis, native, .NET, dynamic instrumentation, WebView, devices, rebuild, and job/artifact management. Each tool roughly maps to a real capability, but the set is large enough that a few (guidance, doctor, jobs, artifacts) could plausibly be folded together.
Coverage is broad: inspect/decode APK, DEX and resource queries, native and managed analysis, Frida tracing, WebView debugging, rebuild/sign, search, evidence, and job orchestration form a coherent workflow. Minor gaps exist — device interaction stops at getprop/packages/processes/logcat with no file push/pull or device-side artifact retrieval, and keystore creation is assumed rather than provided.