Skip to main content
Glama
android-reserve-mcp

android-reserve-mcp

by lonnnnnng

Related Servers

Alternatives to android-reserve-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to inspect Android APKs, device state, runtime behavior, resources, and native libraries locally, returning findings with supporting evidence, coverage, limitations, and unknowns.
      369,596 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables offline Android package analysis by loading APK, DEX, JAR, class, and XAPK files to inspect app metadata, manifests, classes, methods, resources, strings, and cross-references, and to export decompiled Java sources through CRUDE MCP-AQL tools.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Codex users to query an evidence-backed Android reference atlas, inspect projects, plan APK/firmware investigations and acceptance work, check explicit contracts, and analyze supplied frame captures through thirteen local read-only tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to inspect APKs and resources, analyze native libraries, trace runtime behavior with Frida, and connect app screen actions to code through ADB.
      89
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables mobile application penetration testing with 83+ tools covering Frida instrumentation, APK analysis, decompilation, signing, emulator support, and system compatibility checks.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct resources (dex, native, frida, webview, resources, script), and several descriptions explicitly disambiguate neighbors (search is not DEX xref, native vs frida static/dynamic). However the `artifact` (content-based identification/extraction) vs `artifacts` (list/read task files) pair is a near-collision that will cause misselection, and `apk`/`packages`/`decode` plus `framework`/`managed` have overlapping edges that only the long descriptions disentangle.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming is consistently lowercase single tokens throughout, which is readable, but it never encodes an action (no verb_noun pattern) so the operation must be inferred from the description. Singular/plural collisions (`artifact` vs `artifacts`) and role-mixed tokens (`doctor`, `guidance`, `jobs`) weaken predictability.

    Tool Count3/5

    20 tools is at the heavy end, though the domain genuinely spans static analysis, native, .NET, dynamic instrumentation, WebView, devices, rebuild, and job/artifact management. Each tool roughly maps to a real capability, but the set is large enough that a few (guidance, doctor, jobs, artifacts) could plausibly be folded together.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: inspect/decode APK, DEX and resource queries, native and managed analysis, Frida tracing, WebView debugging, rebuild/sign, search, evidence, and job orchestration form a coherent workflow. Minor gaps exist — device interaction stops at getprop/packages/processes/logcat with no file push/pull or device-side artifact retrieval, and keystore creation is assumed rather than provided.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues