Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenInvest

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to conduct cited equity research with independent committee views, reproducible backtests, and a locally stored, auditable track record through five MCP tools.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and developers to independently verify trading-strategy backtests, detect look-ahead bias, hidden costs, and overfitting, and obtain verdicts with reproducible, optionally signed certificates.
      244 PyPI
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Deterministic market-state engine for trading agents — zero LLM in the signal path. 8 tools: structural market state & phase, action gate (GO/WATCH/HOLD), entry/target/invalidation coordinates, bar-by-bar state timeline, composed view cards, and pre-trade intent validation. Every output traces to a bar-stamped ledger with a public daily self-scoring track record.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Portfolio & trading-strategy stress diagnostics for AI agents: multi-asset stress with hedge-break detection, a daily preregistered regime outlook and deflated-Sharpe backtest-integrity checks. Remote streamable-HTTP endpoint with a free tier (no key); this repo is the public server card.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Personal investment management advisor that exposes tools for accounts, portfolios, trades, market data, strategies, risk control, and advice, enabling AI agents to analyze and provide structured investment recommendations.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides multi-agent equity research for US markets with provenance-backed financial data from SEC EDGAR, technicals, macro, and Alpaca paper trading, enforcing risk limits and journaling theses.
      27
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 36 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, well separated by descriptions: the ledger ops (buy, sell, record_dividend, record_split, etc.), the committee paths (prepare/submit/run), and analysis tools (status, rebalance_plan, what_if) do not collide. The main soft overlap is among read-ledger tools (history, decisions, discipline, explain_decision) and between strategy vs set_allocations vs status, but the descriptions differentiate them adequately.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority follow a predictable snake_case verb_noun or resource pattern (add_news_source, remove_news_source, record_fee, set_allocations, track_asset, untrack_asset, record_split). Read-only tools are bare nouns (strategy, history, status, doctor, live_prices), which is a minor but readable deviation rather than a chaotic mix.

    Tool Count3/5

    36 tools is heavy and above the comfortable 3-15 band, but the surface legitimately spans several distinct subdomains (portfolio ledger, fund orders, committee workflow, news pipeline, strategy config, reporting), so each tool roughly earns its place rather than being redundant.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface is remarkably complete: full portfolio lifecycle (buy/sell/deposit/withdraw/dividend/split/fee/ROC/fund orders), strategy configuration (set_allocations, track/untrack, read strategy), committee end-to-end (prepare/submit/run/decisions/explain/record_execution), and news ingestion. No obvious dead ends for the stated investment-assistant purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week