Skip to main content
Glama
longbridge

longbridge

Official

Screener Recommend Strategies

screener_recommend_strategies
Read-onlyIdempotent

List preset screener strategies for US, HK, CN, or SG markets, then use the returned strategy ID to run a screen or inspect its filter conditions.

Instructions

List platform-preset screener strategies. market: US|HK|CN|SG (default: US). Pass id to screener_search strategy_id to run, or screener_strategy to inspect filter conditions.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
_jqNoOptional jq filter (jaq syntax) applied to this tool's JSON response before it is returned; it never changes the upstream request. One output is returned as-is, several as a JSON array, none as []. Module imports and the `env`/`debug`/`stderr` builtins are unavailable. Example: .data | map({symbol}). Omit for the full response.
marketNoMarket filter: "US" | "HK" | "CN" | "SG" (default: "US")

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.12.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / _jq / description
      Added value: +"Optional jq filter (jaq syntax) applied to this tool's JSON response before it is returned; it never changes the upstream request. One output is returned as-is, several as a JSON array, none as []. Module imports and the `env`/`debug`/`stderr` builtins are unavailable. Example: .data | map({symbol}). Omit for the full response."
  2. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.10.6
    • addedInput schema / properties / _jq
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "$defs": {
      -    "ScreenerStrategyItem": {
      -      "properties": {
      -        "description": {
      -          "type": [
      -            "string",
      -            "null"
      -          ]
      -        },
      -        "id": {
      -          "type": [
      -            "string",
      -            "null"
      -          ]
      -        },
      -        "market": {
      -          "type": [
      -            "string",
      -            "null"
      -          ]
      -        },
      -        "name": {
      -          "type": [
      -            "string",
      -            "null"
      -          ]
      -        },
      -        "risk": {
      -          "type": [
      -            "string",
      -            "null"
      -          ]
      -        },
      -        "three_months_chg": {
      -          "type": [
      -            "string",
      -            "null"
      -          ]
      -        }
      -      },
      -      "type": "object"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "properties": {
      -    "strategys": {
      -      "items": {
      -        "$ref": "#/$defs/ScreenerStrategyItem"
      -      },
      -      "type": [
      -        "array",
      -        "null"
      -      ]
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv0.8.7
    • addedOutput schema / $defs / ScreenerStrategyItem / properties / description
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": [
      +    "string",
      +    "null"
      +  ]
      +}
  4. Changed1 schema field changedv0.7.1
    • removedInput schema / title
      Removed value: -"ScreenerRecommendStrategiesParam"
  5. Changed11 schema fields changedv0.6.0
    • removedOutput schema / $defs / ScreenerStrategyItem / description
      Removed value: -"A single screener strategy entry. Subset of upstream fields; the change\nfigure is stringified by the transform pipeline."
    • removedOutput schema / $defs / ScreenerStrategyItem / properties / description
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Strategy description.",
      -  "type": [
      -    "string",
      -    "null"
      -  ]
      -}
    • removedOutput schema / $defs / ScreenerStrategyItem / properties / id / description
      Removed value: -"Strategy ID. Pass to `screener_search` `strategy_id` to run, or to\n`screener_strategy` to inspect the filter conditions."
    • removedOutput schema / $defs / ScreenerStrategyItem / properties / market / description
      Removed value: -"Market the strategy targets, e.g. \"US\" / \"HK\" / \"CN\" / \"SG\"."
    • removedOutput schema / $defs / ScreenerStrategyItem / properties / name / description
      Removed value: -"Strategy display name."
    • removedOutput schema / $defs / ScreenerStrategyItem / properties / risk / description
      Removed value: -"Risk classification label."
    • removedOutput schema / $defs / ScreenerStrategyItem / properties / three_months_chg / description
      Removed value: -"Trailing three-month change (stringified decimal / percentage)."
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • removedOutput schema / description
      Removed value: -"Returned by `screener_recommend_strategies` and `screener_user_strategies`.\nThe documented portion is `strategys[]`."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / strategys / description
      Removed value: -"Screener strategies (note the upstream `strategys` spelling)."
    • removedOutput schema / title
      Removed value: -"ScreenerStrategiesResponse"
  6. Changed1 schema field changedv0.5.6
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$defs": {
      +    "ScreenerStrategyItem": {
      +      "description": "A single screener strategy entry. Subset of upstream fields; the change\nfigure is stringified by the transform pipeline.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "description": {
      +          "description": "Strategy description.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "id": {
      +          "description": "Strategy ID. Pass to `screener_search` `strategy_id` to run, or to\n`screener_strategy` to inspect the filter conditions.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "market": {
      +          "description": "Market the strategy targets, e.g. \"US\" / \"HK\" / \"CN\" / \"SG\".",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "name": {
      +          "description": "Strategy display name.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "risk": {
      +          "description": "Risk classification label.",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "three_months_chg": {
      +          "description": "Trailing three-month change (stringified decimal / percentage).",
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      +  "description": "Returned by `screener_recommend_strategies` and `screener_user_strategies`.\nThe documented portion is `strategys[]`.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "strategys": {
      +      "description": "Screener strategies (note the upstream `strategys` spelling).",
      +      "items": {
      +        "$ref": "#/$defs/ScreenerStrategyItem"
      +      },
      +      "type": [
      +        "array",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "title": "ScreenerStrategiesResponse",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  7. Addedv0.4.5

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the description does not need to restate safety traits. It adds platform-preset scoping and downstream routing, but no detail on response shape or pagination; this is acceptable but not exceptional.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no filler: purpose is front-loaded, followed by market guidance and downstream usage. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only list tool with no required parameters and full annotations, the description is nearly complete. It does not explicitly describe the response shape beyond listing strategies and providing an id, but the downstream references make the contract clear enough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description restates the market values and default, and references the id field in downstream usage, but adds no meaning beyond what the input schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('List') and names the resource ('platform-preset screener strategies'), making the tool's purpose immediately clear. The word 'platform-preset' also distinguishes it from user-defined strategy tools like screener_user_strategies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives concrete downstream guidance: pass the returned id to screener_search or screener_strategy. It does not explicitly contrast this tool with screener_user_strategies, but the usage context is clear enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools